AI4LDILDF 2.0 Agentic Ecosystem

Integrative Learning Design Framework 2.0

ILDF 2.0 Agentic Ecosystem

A suite of AI-powered practitioner tools organized across five phases of the Integrative Learning Design Framework — grounding every design decision in learning science, human judgment, and the perspectives of the people you are designing with.

Agents that carry out multi-step work on their own are getting a lot of attention right now. Today this ecosystem is a set of tools with structured internal reasoning, and a system that chains them together: you enter one project, work through the tools that fit each ILDF phase, and each tool builds on what the last one produced. You lead every session. We aspire toward and are working on agentic features for the next bundle: tools that carry more of the routine design work forward on their own, with the design decisions still yours.

Read the white paper →

Five-Phase Design Research Cycle

Free tools are open to everyone. Stack, Ecosystem, and Bundle tools stay fully visible here and unlock with purchase at ai4ld.com/products.

03Live

Evaluation of Local Impact

04Live

Evaluation of Broader Impact

05Live

Continuous Adaptation

A Cross-Phase Commitment

Designing with target populations — not just for them.

Every ILDF 2.0 tool includes a participatory design touchpoint — prompting practitioners to bring the voices, experiences, and perspectives of their learners and performers into the design process from Phase 1 onwards, not only at the evaluation stage.

Phase 1 — Informed Exploration · Now Available

Performance & Instructional Analysis

Before you design anything, determine whether training or instructional intervention is actually warranted.

A structured analysis grounded in Gilbert's BEM, Mager & Pipe, Rossett, and Cognitive Load Theory — producing a Learning Design Brief you can hand to a VP without apologizing for it.

Start Analysis

FreeTakes 5 minutes · No account required

🔍

Cause Analysis First

Six-cell BEM scan reveals whether the gap is environmental, motivational, or a genuine skill/knowledge problem — before you spend a dollar on content.

📋

Theoretically Defensible

Every finding cites a named framework. Gilbert (1978), Mager & Pipe (1984), Sweller (1988). Not “AI thinks.” Frameworks you can cite to leadership.

🤖

AI Affordances Mapped

If training is warranted, the brief maps which AI affordance — Reasoning, Memory, Agency, or Human-AI Collaboration — fits the gap type and why.

Phase 2 — Enactment · Now Available

AI Affordance MapperFree to try

Once you know the intervention is warranted, pick your AI affordance — Memory, Reasoning, Agency, or Human-AI Collaboration — and get a structured design brief grounded in learning science, with a participatory design plan built in.

Open Affordance Mapper →
“What is really needed is a thorough analysis and linkage to AI affordances and learning theory.”

— Senior LXD, Fortune 500 L&D team